A 75-year-old woman sought a consultation for a tummy tuck, during which she mentioned to her surgeon that she suffered from mild urinary incontinence. Her surgeon referred her to his partner, who recommended corrective surgery for the problem. The surgery was not reasonably calculated to address her urinary incontinence, and instead left her with severe, permanent fecal incontinence and little to no vaginal opening. Despite a follow-up operation, the plaintiff is still unable to engage in sexual intercourse with her husband. Jeffrey A. Milman and Jessica Vanden Brink with Hodes Milman represented the plaintiff and her husband; an arbitration of $90,000 was awarded.

MEET THE ATTORNEYS

hm attorneys

When you work with us, you’ll see the difference. A lot of firms are quick to show you numbers, and it is absolutely true that your lawyer should have experience and a strong track record in the area that you require. However, we’ll take it one step further. We also believe that your attorney should put your needs, cares and desires first. Because you deserve more than just compensation for your losses - you deserve a true advocate.

hm attorneys